Kirill Kivattsev vs Raffael Schaer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Kivattsev is stronger on second serve performance, winning 48.56% of points, compared to Schaer's 43.14%. Does this give Kivattsev an edge? Yes, particularly because this metric is highly indicative of match outcomes.
• However, Schaer excels in the return game, winning 50.35% of opponents' second serve points and 29.49% of first serve returns, outperforming Kivattsev's 46.11% and 23.9%. Does this make Schaer more potent when returning serves? The stats suggest it does.
• When facing pressure, Kivattsev has managed to save 53.73% of breakpoints, significantly higher than Schaer's 44.74%, offering him an advantage during crucial moments.
• Looking at overall performance, Kivattsev has a superior match win rate over the last year at 56.92% compared to Schaer's 38.89%, implying better overall form.
• Regarding surface preference, Kivattsev's win percentage on grass is a remarkable 75%, while Schaer achieves their best on indoor hard courts with a 60% win rate. Could surface choice influence the match? Indeed, it could be pivotal based on past performances.
• Both players mostly compete at the ITF $10K level, but Kivattsev's win percentage here is notably higher at 60.71%, showing greater consistency at this competition level.
• The average rank of Kivattsev's opponents over the past 12 months is 467.06, much lower than Schaer's average of 90.83, suggesting Schaer regularly faces tougher competition.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Kivattsev's 50% win rate over the last year surpasses Schaer's 29% statistic, indicating Kivattsev's resilience in crucial scenarios.
• Although Schaer boasts a better break point conversion rate of 38.71% compared to Kivattsev's 30.28%, the latter's ability to save breakpoints could neutralize this advantage.

Editorial Prediction (June 10, 2025, UTC):

Kivattsev's strength in second serve performance and ability to save breakpoints under pressure are critical elements that favor him in crucial stages of the match.

While Schaer's superior return percentages represent a significant threat, Kivattsev's overall higher match win rate and proven performance in deciding sets suggest greater consistency and resilience.

Taking into account recent form and surface statistics, Kivattsev's all-around game aligns well with the competitive conditions expected in this match.

Given these factors, Kivattsev is the likely victor in this upcoming encounter, unless Schaer manages to leverage his return game advantage significantly.